People ex rel. Metzger v. District Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \jurors [are] entitled to draw reasonable inferences from the evidence based on their own common-sense understanding of the world\
• explaining that “jurors [are] entitled to draw reasonable inferences from the evidence based on their own common-sense understanding of the world”
• explaining that “jurors [are] entitled to draw reasonable inferences from the evidence based on their own common-sense understanding of the world”
• noting that a jury is not required to leave its common sense at the door in resolving a case
• jurors are permitted to consider \their own common-sense understanding of the world\ when drawing reasonable inferences from circumstantial evidence
• “[B]ecause [the defendant] did not object to the trial court’s supplemental instructions, we review the instructions only for plain error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).