Stieneke v. Russi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing a trial court's damage award for negligent misrepresentation because the economic loss rule precludes tort damages where losses are purely economic
• stating appellate court “may resort to the trial court’s oral decision to ascertain the legal and factual basis upon which the trial court predicated its finding”
• “Because we remand this case, neither party is entitled to attorney fees. If the trial court finds that the Stienekes met the required standard of proof, it should award attorney fees for this appeal as well.”
• fraud claims were on the contract and allowed for fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).