Stickels v. Heckel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a purported Rule 60 motion was in fact a new-trial motion because it challenged the court’s factual findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Barnett v. Gomance
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2010-02-03· cited 8×
• White v. White
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2014-10-29· cited 5×
• Horton v. Horton
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2011-05-11· cited 5×
• Central Arkansas Foundation Homes, LLC v. Choate
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2011-04-06· cited 4×
• Nineteen Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety-Four Dollars ($19,894.00) in American Currency v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2016-05-04· cited 1×
• Walden v. Jackson I
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2016-11-30· cited 1×
• Bashiri v. Frankian
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2013-10-23
• Combined Healthcare Federal Credit Union v. Arands Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2011-04-13

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Slaton v. Slaton
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-10-16· cited 63×
• Jt Jackson v. Arkansas Power & Light Company
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-06-08· cited 22×
• Holifield v. Mullenax Financial & Tax Advisory Group, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2009-04-15· cited 18×
• United Southern Assurance Co. v. Beard
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-03-27· cited 12×
• Shipp v. Shipp
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2006-03-01· cited 6×