Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 8/10/2000
Stewart v. State
Citations
- 22 S.W.3d 646
- 2000 WL 795296
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the corroboration of details that are easily obtainable at the time of the tip and which do not indicate criminal activity will not lend support to the tip
- holding that officer’s corroboration that two individuals occupied a green Camaro did not give officer basis for crediting informer’s accusation that driver was intoxicated
- holding that officer’s corroboration that two individuals occupied a green Camaro did not give officer basis for crediting informer’s accusation that driver was intoxicated
- holding that officer = s corroboration that two individuals occupied a green Camaro did not give officer basis for crediting informer = s accusation that driver was intoxicated
- holding that the corroboration of details that are easily obtainable at the time of the tip and which do not indicate criminal activity will not lend support to the tip
- holding that the corroboration of details that are easily obtainable at the time of the tip and which do not indicate criminal activity will not lend support to the tip
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Yeakel, Patterson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brother v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-06-29· cited 351×
- People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-06-26· cited 132×
- United States v. Wade Allen WheatEighth Circuit· 2001-12-28· cited 122×
- State v. FudgeTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-05-17· cited 93×
- State v. GriffeyTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-12-13· cited 88×
- State v. ContrerasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-09-12· cited 76×
- Hawes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-04-15· cited 65×
- State v. WalshireSupreme Court of Iowa· 2001-10-10· cited 65×
- Hall v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2002-04-08· cited 53×
- Bilyeu v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2004-04-29· cited 51×
- Dowler v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-04-12· cited 41×
- State v. PrendergastHawaii Supreme Court· 2004-02-02· cited 41×
- Reesing v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2004-06-10· cited 39×
- Gilmore v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2010-08-12· cited 25×
- State v. SchollSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-06-30· cited 24×
- State v. LosoyaTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2004-02-20· cited 22×
- Turner v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2008-04-02· cited 21×
- In re A.T.H.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2003-05-08· cited 19×
- Blevins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-05-23· cited 17×
- State v. SatterSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-05-13· cited 8×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 3,282×
- Florida v. JLSupreme Court· 2000-03-28· cited 1,350×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-06-04· cited 1,223×
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-11-05· cited 905×
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-12-15· cited 215×
- State v. StolteCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1999-04-08· cited 121×
- Davis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-03-25· cited 88×
- Rapp Collins Worldwide, Inc. v. MohrTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1998-10-12· cited 14×
- Sweeney v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1999-12-17· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.