Skip to main content

Stewart v. State

Citations

  • 22 S.W.3d 646
  • 2000 WL 795296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the corroboration of details that are easily obtainable at the time of the tip and which do not indicate criminal activity will not lend support to the tip
  • holding that officer’s corroboration that two individuals occupied a green Camaro did not give officer basis for crediting informer’s accusation that driver was intoxicated
  • holding that officer’s corroboration that two individuals occupied a green Camaro did not give officer basis for crediting informer’s accusation that driver was intoxicated
  • holding that officer = s corroboration that two individuals occupied a green Camaro did not give officer basis for crediting informer = s accusation that driver was intoxicated
  • holding that the corroboration of details that are easily obtainable at the time of the tip and which do not indicate criminal activity will not lend support to the tip
  • holding that the corroboration of details that are easily obtainable at the time of the tip and which do not indicate criminal activity will not lend support to the tip

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Yeakel, Patterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.