Skip to main content

Stewart v. State

Citations

  • 33 S.W.3d 785
  • 2000 Tenn. LEXIS 711
  • 2000 WL 1855060

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, outside the Tennessee 6 A narrow exception to sovereign immunity also exists when a plaintiff is suing a state official for prospective relief in order to protect a constitutional right. See Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 155-57 (1908
  • indicating that, under the Claims Commission Act, jurisdiction could be predicated on assumed duties
  • stating that the word “and” is generally interpreted in the conjunctive
  • applying common law principles of assumption of a duty where one is not legally imposed to a claim for negligent control
  • applying common law principles of assumption of a duty where one is not legally imposed to a claim for negligent control
  • state trooper did not assume a duty to control the actions of local police officers at the scene of an arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice William M. Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

135 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.