Gleaves v. Checker Cab Transit Corp., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that “it is not for the courts to alter or amend a statute”
• reasoning that “it is not for the courts to alter or amend a statute”
• “[A] court ascertains a statute’s purpose from the plain and ordinary meaning of its language . . . .”
• “The rules of statutory interpretation are used when interpreting an ordinance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).