Skip to main content

Stewart v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 306 S.W.3d 502
  • 2010 Ky. LEXIS 57
  • 2010 WL 997408

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Possession of a controlled substance does not require proof of an additional fact that promoting contraband does.”
  • “Possession of a controlled substance does not require proof of an additional fact that promoting contraband does.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abramson, Cunningham, Minton, Noble, Schroder, Scott, Venters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.