First Circuit· 2/28/1995
Stewart v. Coalter
Citations
- 48 F.3d 610
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 3915
- 1995 WL 78101
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling that a federal habeas court 5 reviews insufficiency of evidence claims de novo
- speculating that scope of habeas will be narrowed
- “A rational jury might well have acquitted without violating its oath; but drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of the prosecution, a rational jury could also convict”
- discussing permissible inferences in criminal cases
- discussing <br>permissible inferences in criminal cases
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Selya, Boudin, Stahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court· 2002-12-31· cited 4,611×
- Winfield v. O'BrienFirst Circuit· 2014-12-18· cited 168×
- United States v. SpinneyFirst Circuit· 1995-09-19· cited 155×
- United States v. LaraFirst Circuit· 1999-06-30· cited 142×
- Hurtado v. TuckerFirst Circuit· 2001-03-29· cited 134×
- United States v. Robert P. Deluca, Sr., United States of America v. Gerard T. Ouimette, United States of America v. Gerard T. OuimetteFirst Circuit· 1998-04-14· cited 125×
- United States v. Luciano MosqueraFirst Circuit· 1995-08-28· cited 116×
- Gunter v. MaloneyFirst Circuit· 2002-05-02· cited 109×
- Raymond Ellsworth v. Warden, New Hampshire State Prison, and Philip McLaughlin Attorney General for the State of New HampshireFirst Circuit· 2003-06-16· cited 88×
- Brewer v. Marshall, SheriffFirst Circuit· 1997-07-21· cited 74×
- O'Laughlin v. O'BrienFirst Circuit· 2009-06-10· cited 74×
- Leftwich v. MaloneyFirst Circuit· 2008-07-02· cited 51×
- Magraw v. RodenFirst Circuit· 2014-02-14· cited 43×
- Linton v. SabaFirst Circuit· 2016-02-01· cited 43×
- United States v. MooreSeventh Circuit· 2009-07-09· cited 41×
- State v. GermainSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2013-11-05· cited 34×
- United States v. BurgosFirst Circuit· 2012-12-14· cited 28×
- Morgan v. DickhautFirst Circuit· 2012-04-27· cited 27×
- United States v. ShawFirst Circuit· 2012-02-29· cited 21×
- United States v. BradyFirst Circuit· 1999-02-26· cited 18×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1952-01-02· cited 3,286×
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 3,060×
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court· 1985-12-03· cited 1,743×
- O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court· 1995-02-21· cited 1,687×
- Wright v. WestSupreme Court· 1992-06-19· cited 1,604×
- Nazzaro Scarpa v. Larry E. Dubois, Etc.First Circuit· 1994-10-18· cited 374×
- Ingram v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-06-29· cited 355×
- Commonwealth v. GreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-03-19· cited 151×
- United States v. Frank Oreto, Sr., United States of America v. Frank Oreto, Jr., United States of America v. Dennis PetrosinoFirst Circuit· 1994-10-04· cited 117×
- Commonwealth v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-07-18· cited 111×
- United States v. George A. MoranFirst Circuit· 1993-01-20· cited 103×
- United States v. ValerioFirst Circuit· 1995-02-27· cited 97×
- United States v. WhitingFirst Circuit· 1994-07-06· cited 86×
- Commonwealth v. ClaudioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1994-06-14· cited 62×
- Commonwealth v. StewartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-12-09· cited 59×
- Commonwealth v. GoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-03-28· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. StewartMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1991-05-14· cited 9×
- Stewart v. CoalterD. Massachusetts· 1994-06-07· cited 4×
Other cases named Stewart v. Coalter
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.