United States v. Luciano Mosquera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that relief for appellate delay requires a showing of prejudice, such as a demonstration that the delay impaired the appeal or the defense in the event of retrial
• holding that gun \carried at a time when the offense was in progress\ constituted \during\ for purposes of 924(c)(1)
• holding that there was \an adequate factual predicate supporting an inference of guilt on the crime charged\ such that evidence of flight could be admitted where the defendant and his co-conspirators fled from police officers who interrupted a drug shipment
• upholding restriction of cross-examination on penalty witness would have faced had gov- ernment not dropped charges
• “Aiding and abetting requires that ‘the defendant [have] associated himself with the venture, participated in it as in something he wished to bring about, and sought by his actions to make it succeed.’ ”
• finding no Confrontation Clause violation where a district court limited testimony regarding sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).