Stevenson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Florida Supreme Court has interpreted the test set forth [in the definition of “oral communication” under section 934.02(2) ] as substantially the same test used in a Fourth Amendment right to privacy analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brandin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-02-06· cited 10×
• Abdo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-08-01· cited 4×
• McDade v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-07· cited 3×
• Brugmann v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-12· cited 3×
• State v. Caraballo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-03-09
• State v. Garcia
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-07-25
• SHARRON TASHA FORD v. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-05-05
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. KIMBERLY D. FOSTER
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-07-21
• SHARRON TASHA FORD v. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-08-04

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chandler v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1981-01-26· cited 257×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-06-16· cited 55×
• State v. Inciarrano
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-06-27· cited 45×
• State v. Mozo
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-04-13· cited 40×
• Mozo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-19· cited 15×
• Dept. of Agriculture v. Edwards
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-05· cited 15×
• Chandler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-12-19· cited 13×
• LaPorte v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-08-12· cited 8×
• Cinci v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-31· cited 7×