Stevens v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although an indictment which tracks the language of the statute is ordinarily sufficient, it is not sufficient where more particularity is necessary to meet the requirement of notice to the accused

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Grimes
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1994-07-22· cited 106×
• State v. Williams
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1995-05-05· cited 42×
• Goyzueta v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2008-08-26· cited 30×
• Tanner v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1992-09-02· cited 12×
• Martinez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1993-04-01· cited 1×
• Franco Andre Goyzueta v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2008-08-26

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Houston v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-02-01· cited 426×
• Wilson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-23· cited 385×
• Daniels v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-06-01· cited 261×
• Jackson v. State of Texas
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-07-18· cited 197×
• Engelking v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-04-20· cited 153×
• Briggs v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-11-25· cited 105×
• Beck v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-01-09· cited 62×
• Burleson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1991-01-25· cited 16×
• Beck v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1987-10-08· cited 16×
• Mathis v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1983-04-13· cited 6×