· 8/26/2008
Goyzueta v. State
Citations
- 266 S.W.3d 126
- 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 6565
- 2008 WL 3918023
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “An overbreadth attack on a statute is recognized only in the context of a First Amendment challenge.”
- “An overbreadth attack on a statute is recognized only in the context of a First Amendment challenge.”
- “[I]f there is no constitutional defect in the application of the statute to a litigant, he does not have standing to argue that it would be unconstitutional if applied to third parties in hypothetical situations.”
- “[I]f there is no constitutional defect in the application of the statute to a litigant, he does not have standing to argue that it would be unconstitutional if applied to third parties in hypothetical situations.”
- A [I]f there is no constitutional defect in the application of the statute to a litigant, he does not have standing to argue that it would be unconstitutional if applied to third parties in hypothetical situations. @
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gardner, Walker, McCoy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.