Skip to main content
· 8/26/2008

Goyzueta v. State

Citations

  • 266 S.W.3d 126
  • 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 6565
  • 2008 WL 3918023

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “An overbreadth attack on a statute is recognized only in the context of a First Amendment challenge.”
  • “An overbreadth attack on a statute is recognized only in the context of a First Amendment challenge.”
  • “[I]f there is no constitutional defect in the application of the statute to a litigant, he does not have standing to argue that it would be unconstitutional if applied to third parties in hypothetical situations.”
  • “[I]f there is no constitutional defect in the application of the statute to a litigant, he does not have standing to argue that it would be unconstitutional if applied to third parties in hypothetical situations.”
  • A [I]f there is no constitutional defect in the application of the statute to a litigant, he does not have standing to argue that it would be unconstitutional if applied to third parties in hypothetical situations. @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gardner, Walker, McCoy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.