Sterling Acceptance Corp. v. Tommark, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ten instances of confusion when each of the parties engaged in a large volume of commerce over a long period of time qualified as de minimus
• “The test for trademark infringement and unfair competition under state law is the same as the test under the Lanham Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).