Inc. Publishing Corp. v. Manhattan Magazine, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that MARCH OF TIME was not descriptive for newsreel series
• denying a permanent injunction, reasoning that “[g]iven significant volume of sales over time, isolated instances of actual confusion may be disregarded as de minimis.”
• “Given this wealth of information and interlocking levels of responsibility for recommending and placing ads, I consider it most unlikely that an advertiser would place an ad in [the] magazine ‘Manhattan, inc.’ under the mistaken impression that he was advertising in [the] magazine ‘Inc.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).