Skip to main content

Stephens v. Van Arsdale

Citations

  • 608 P.2d 972
  • 227 Kan. 676
  • 6 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1142
  • 1980 Kan. LEXIS 246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that court records are generally open public records
  • statutory denial of access to criminal court records not unconstitutional where convictions are ordered \expunged\
  • statutory denial of access to criminal court records not unconstitutional where convictions are ordered “expunged”
  • “On occasion, this court, when confronted with significant issues of statewide concern, has broadened the availability of mandamus in order to expeditiously resolve the is sues.”
  • speedy adjudication warranted in mandamus proceeding to resolve questions of law for guidance of state officers
  • \Mandamus will not lie to compel a public officer to perform an unauthorized act.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland, Prager

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.