Skip to main content

Stephens v. State

Citations

  • 750 S.W.2d 52
  • 295 Ark. 541
  • 1988 Ark. LEXIS 256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that courts should not presume acquiescence in the loss of fundamental rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glaze, Hays, Hickman, Purtle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.