Skip to main content

Stephens v. State

Citations

  • 559 So. 2d 687
  • 1990 WL 39904

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a comment on the defendant's right to remain silent, in the face of overwhelming evidence of guilt, would constitute harmless error
  • finding that appellant's statement during trial regarding his right to remain silent should not have been admitted, but was harmless error given the overwhelming evidence of guilt established at trial
  • one juror had a criminal record; another juror had previously been arrested on the same charge as defendant
  • juror had apparent difficulty reading the jury questionnaire

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.