Skip to main content

Stephens v. State

Citations

  • 431 S.E.2d 422
  • 208 Ga. App. 620
  • 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 1911
  • 1993 Ga. App. LEXIS 522

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court did not err in denying defendant’s request for continuance to hire new counsel because “he felt mighty incompetent with [his appointed] attorney”
  • defendant gave no reason why he waited until the day of trial to hire new counsel, stating only that he felt “‘mighty incompetent’” with appointed counsel; no indication in record that tactic was other than attempt to delay trial
  • although racial distinctions are offensive and will be closely scrutinized, “we cannot say that every such reference is prejudicial as a matter of law; to call it a deficiency of counsel as a matter of law might deprive a defendant of an important defense in some cases”
  • although racial distinctions are offensive and will be closely scrutinized, “we cannot say that every such reference is prejudicial as a matter of law; to call it a deficiency of counsel as a matter of law might deprive a defendant of an important defense in some cases”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birdsong, Pope, Andrews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.