Skip to main content
· 7/8/2013

Stephen Yonek v. Shinseki

Citations

  • 722 F.3d 1355
  • 2013 WL 3368972
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 13714

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where an agency includes particular language in one section of a regulation but omits it in another[,] [courts] generally presume[] that the agency acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dyk, Clevenger, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.