Segundo Mariano v. Anthony J. Principi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it would be improper for the Secretary to purposely obtain evidence against a claim
• holding that VA medical examiner’s conclusions were of “questionable probative value” because examiner failed to consider certain information
• holding that, under section 7261(a)(4) and (b)(1), Court reviews as factual determination Secretary’s application of “equipoise standard” under 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b)
• holding that VA medical examiner’s conclusions were of “questionable probative value” because examiner failed to consider certain information
• concluding that there was no plausible basis in the record for the Board's factual determination that the evidence preponderated in support of a finding that the appellant's arthritis was not a residual of his service-connected gunshot wound
• concluding that there was no plausible basis in the record for the Board’s factual determination that the evidence preponderated in support of a finding that the appellant’s arthritis was not a residual of his service-connected gunshot wound

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).