Stephanie W. v. Maxwell V.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \ '[A]n issue raised for the first time in a motion for reconsideration is not timely’ and is therefore not preserved for appeal.\ (quoting Stadnicky v. Southpark Terrace Homeowner's Ass'n, 939 P.2d 403, 405 (Alaska 1997))
• “The superior court generally has broad discretion in sanctioning discovery violations [under Civil Rule 37], subject only to review for abuse of discretion.” (alteration in original) (quoting Hikita v. Nichiro Gyogyo Kaisha, Ltd., 12 P.2d 1169, 1175 (Alaska 2000)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).