Stensby v. Effjohn Oy Ab

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs claim failed because plaintiff “introduced no evidence that, if the agreement had not been breached, the venture itself would have otherwise been consummated.”
• “It is of course established that a breach-of-contract-plaintiff must show that the defendants’ breach was a ‘substantial factor’ in causing damage.”
• “It is of course established that a breach-of-contract-plaintiff must show that the defendants’ breach was a ‘substantial factor’ in causing damage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).