Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Morse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defense counsel’s comments that one of the plaintiffs’ trial attorneys had “prodded” one of the plaintiffs into giving answers and that the plaintiffs responses “had to have been told by his attorneys” were improper
• opposing counsel referred to as \lying\ and \committing a fraud\ upon the court and jury
• holding derogatory comments attacking the integrity of opposing counsel improper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).