Supreme Court of New Jersey· 5/18/2005
Steneken v. Steneken
Citations
- 873 A.2d 501
- 183 N.J. 290
- 2005 N.J. LEXIS 578
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring that spousal support and property distribution—“both jointly and severally—satisfy basic concepts of fairness” in view of their different but interrelated purposes
- reasoning that “the valuation methodology chosen for equitable distribution should not alter the alimony award” because statutory factors—not the valuation methodology—govern alimony
- emphasizing because alimony and equitable distribution serve two separate purposes, it is not required that \a credit on one side of the ledger must perforce require a debit on the other side\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rivera-Soto, Long
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jordana Elrom v. Elad ElromNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2015-02-23· cited 188×
- Jacoby v. JacobyNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2012-07-11· cited 153×
- Larbig v. LarbigNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2006-02-02· cited 109×
- NANCY G. SLUTSKY VS. KENNETH J. SLUTSKY (FM-14-1535-08, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2017-08-08· cited 103×
- Clark v. ClarkNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2012-10-19· cited 103×
- J.E.V. v. K.V.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2012-06-21· cited 87×
- Tannen v. TannenNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2010-08-31· cited 78×
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia· 2010-11-22· cited 30×
- M.G. v. S.M.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2018-12-26· cited 26×
- Lisa Lombardi v. Anthony A. LombardiNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2016-09-12· cited 17×
- Clementi v. ClementiNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2013-08-13· cited 7×
- Oudheusden v. OudheusdenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-04-27· cited 6×
- Cynthia (Pray) Wood McKenna v. Thomas PraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2024-08-06· cited 6×
- DeNike v. CupoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2007-07-06· cited 4×
- Keane v. KeaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-01-26· cited 4×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2005-04-08· cited 2×
- Jev v. KvNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2012-06-21
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court· 1997-03-19· cited 598×
- Lepis v. LepisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-06-11· cited 573×
- Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1974-06-05· cited 314×
- Painter v. PainterSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1974-06-05· cited 215×
- McSparron v. McSparronNew York Court of Appeals· 1995-12-07· cited 148×
- Innes v. InnesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-01-17· cited 132×
- Crews v. CrewsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2000-05-31· cited 130×
- Dugan v. DuganSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-02-28· cited 114×
- Grunfeld v. GrunfeldNew York Court of Appeals· 2000-05-11· cited 89×
- Torres v. Schripps, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-07-09· cited 81×
- Lawson Mardon Wheaton, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-07-14· cited 78×
- Lavene v. LaveneNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-03-14· cited 68×
- Bowen v. BowenSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-04-16· cited 68×
- Steneken v. StenekenNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2004-03-15· cited 59×
- Lavene v. LaveneNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1978-07-31· cited 35×
- Rattee v. RatteeSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-02-15· cited 29×
- D'ORO v. D'OroNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1982-11-09· cited 23×
- D'Oro v. D'OroNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1984-02-07· cited 15×
- Sodaro v. SodaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-08-20· cited 13×
- Murphy v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-04-26· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.