Skip to main content
· 2/2/2006

Larbig v. Larbig

Citations

  • 894 A.2d 1
  • 384 N.J. Super. 17

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deeming twenty months insufficient time to conclude reduction in husband's income was permanent
  • \Whether [a support] obligation should be modified . . . rests within a Family Part judge's sound discretion.\
  • \Whether [a support] obligation should be modified . . . rests within a Family Part judge's sound discretion.\
  • \Whether [a support] obligation should be modified . . . rests within a Family Part judge's sound discretion.\
  • \Whether [a support] obligation should be modified . . . rests within a Family Part judge's sound discretion.\
  • \Whether [a support] obligation should be modified . . . rests within a Family Part judge's sound discretion\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Parker, C.S. Fisher and Yannotti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.