· 2/2/2006
Larbig v. Larbig
Citations
- 894 A.2d 1
- 384 N.J. Super. 17
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deeming twenty months insufficient time to conclude reduction in husband's income was permanent
- \Whether [a support] obligation should be modified . . . rests within a Family Part judge's sound discretion.\
- \Whether [a support] obligation should be modified . . . rests within a Family Part judge's sound discretion.\
- \Whether [a support] obligation should be modified . . . rests within a Family Part judge's sound discretion.\
- \Whether [a support] obligation should be modified . . . rests within a Family Part judge's sound discretion.\
- \Whether [a support] obligation should be modified . . . rests within a Family Part judge's sound discretion\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Parker, C.S. Fisher and Yannotti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.