Stencel v. Augat Wiring Systems

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, “[plaintiffs] claim would fall under the third [Suchodolski ] type of public policy case,” but ultimately dismissing plaintiffs claim for failure to show causation
• dismissing defamation claim against corporation and concluding that it was not pled with sufficient detail where the plaintiff failed to name as defendant(s) any individual person(s) who made the allegedly defamatory statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).