Washington Supreme Court· 6/26/1975
Steele v. State
Citations
- 537 P.2d 782
- 85 Wash. 2d 585
- 1975 Wash. LEXIS 906
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the AGO has some latitude in embarking upon investigations without absolute assurances that the CPA has been violated
- finding that the AGO has some latitude in embarking upon investigations without absolute assurances that the CPA has been violated
- noting that corporations are afforded a limited “ ‘right to privacy’ ” under the law (quoting United States v. Morton Salt Co., 338 U.S. 632, 652, 70 S. Ct. 357, 94 L. Ed. 401 (1950))
- noting that corporations are afforded a limited '\right to privacy\' under the law (quoting United States v. Morton Salt Co., 338 U.S. 632, 652, 70S. Ct. 357, 94 L. Ed. 401 (1950))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Finley, Stafford, Hunter, Hamilton, Wright, Utter, Brachtenbach, Horowitz, Rosellini
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Matter of Personal Restraint of LordWashington Supreme Court· 1994-03-10· cited 352×
- State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court· 2013-04-11· cited 182×
- Scott v. Association for Childbirth at Home, InternationalIllinois Supreme Court· 1981-11-20· cited 124×
- A,B,C,D,E,F,G, & H v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado· 1976-06-14· cited 67×
- State v. MilesWashington Supreme Court· 2007-04-26· cited 66×
- Ameriquest Mortgage Co. v. Office of Attorney GeneralWashington Supreme Court· 2013-05-09· cited 42×
- Washington Education Ass'n v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1982-10-28· cited 35×
- State v. BriseboisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-12-10· cited 17×
- Kohn v. State Ex Rel. HumphreySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-07-15· cited 11×
- Butler v. Federal Way School District No. 210Court of Appeals of Washington· 1977-04-04· cited 10×
- State v. Brelvis Consulting LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-11-20· cited 7×
- State v. DoutyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-07-03· cited 5×
- Goodman v. Kendall Gate-Investco., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-03-10· cited 4×
- Humphreys v. State ex rel. GusteLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1979-03-07· cited 2×
- Ameriquest Mortg. Co. v. Office of Att'y Gen.Washington Supreme Court· 2013-05-09
- Brelvis Consulting, Llc v. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-11-20
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 3,591×
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1920-03-01· cited 2,373×
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 1,228×
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court· 1950-02-06· cited 1,061×
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court· 1946-02-11· cited 1,024×
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1944-06-12· cited 772×
- McPhaul v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-12-12· cited 133×
- Knowles v. HollyWashington Supreme Court· 1973-08-09· cited 74×
- La Belle Creole International, S. A. v. Attorney-GeneralNew York Court of Appeals· 1961-07-07· cited 66×
- DeGrief v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1956-05-24· cited 64×
- Kelleher v. Ephrata School District No. 165Washington Supreme Court· 1960-10-06· cited 33×
- Petition of Gold Bond Stamp CompanyD. Minnesota· 1963-08-09· cited 33×
- Hyster Company v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1964-11-04· cited 32×
- Washington Osteopathic Medical Ass'n v. King County Medical Service Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1970-12-17· cited 28×
- Gold Bond Stamp Company v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1964-01-14· cited 27×
- Naccarato v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court· 1955-01-06· cited 26×
- Dick v. Attorney GeneralWashington Supreme Court· 1974-04-25· cited 21×
- Westinghouse Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-12-19· cited 20×
- Williamson v. Grant County Public Hospital District No. 1Washington Supreme Court· 1964-11-19· cited 12×
- In Re Motions to Quash Subpœnas Duces Tecum Returnable Before the Second Grand JuryS.D. California· 1939-08-29· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.