Skip to main content
· 11/4/1964

Hyster Company v. United States

Citations

  • 338 F.2d 183
  • 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3992
  • 1964 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,283

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • civil investigative demand under Antitrust Civil Process Act is not unreasonable search and seizure in violation of Fourth Amendment to the Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chambers, Jertberg, Duniway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.