Stearns-Roger Mfg. Co. v. Brown
Citations
- 114 F. 939
- 52 C.C.A. 559
- 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4163
Syllabus
<p>1. Right of Appear — Temporary Injunction — Party not Restrained.</p> <p>One too is not restrained from the performance of any act or from the pursuance of any course of conduct by an injunction is not legally aggrieved by the order granting it, and has no right to appeal from such order.1</p> <p>S.Same — Order Issuing Discretionary.</p> <p>The right to exercise a sound judicial discretion in granting or refusing a temporary injunction is vested in the trial court, and not in the appellate court, and its orders should not he disturbed on appeal unless they are violative of the rules of equity which have been established for the guidance of the exercise of its discretion.</p> <p>8. Patents — Preliminary Injunction — Infringement—Review on Appeal.</p> <p>Where the determination of the question of infringement on the hearing of an appeal from an order granting a temporary injunction would not be final, but one of the parties to the suit would be entitled to a consideration and decision of the same issue at the final hearing, the appelate court will defer the decision of the question until after that hearing.</p> <p>4 Same — Temporary Injunction not Granted Unless Infringement Clear.</p> <p>It is the'general rule that a temporary injunction should not be granted on ex parte affidavits in a suit for the infringement of a patent where the question of infringement is grave and difficult, and it is not clear that the defendant is guilty of infringement.</p> <p>5. Same — Temporary Injunction Continued Until Final Hearing on Proper Bond.</p> <p>But in the appellate court the presumption is that the trial court rightfully found infringement, and even where that question is grave, and its decision doubtful, an order granting a temporary injunction will not necessarily be reversed, where the court below has required the complainant to .give bond to protect the defendant against loss from the erroneous issue of the injunction; and a final determination of the question of infri
Judges: Caldwell, Sanborn, Thayer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Milgram v. Loew's, Inc. (Hamilton Street Realty Company, Intervenors)Third Circuit· 1951-12-18· cited 80×
- Pierce v. National Bank of CommerceEighth Circuit· 1920-11-06· cited 59×
- Dodge v. NorlinEighth Circuit· 1904-11-11· cited 40×
- In Re Michigan-Ohio Bldg. CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1941-02-06· cited 38×
- Stokes v. WilliamsThird Circuit· 1915-08-10· cited 38×
- Pratt v. StoutEighth Circuit· 1936-08-05· cited 37×
- Richardson v. LoweEighth Circuit· 1906-10-23· cited 37×
- Choctaw & M. R. Co. v. NewtonEighth Circuit· 1905-07-31· cited 35×
- Cleage v. LaidleyEighth Circuit· 1906-11-08· cited 29×
- Mastin v. NobleEighth Circuit· 1907-11-06· cited 26×
- United States v. ColvardFourth Circuit· 1937-04-06· cited 22×
- West v. W. A. McLaughlin & Co.'s TrusteeSixth Circuit· 1908-06-15· cited 21×
- Frank F. Smith Hardware Co. v. S. H. Pomeroy Co.Second Circuit· 1924-04-07· cited 21×
- Tompkins v. St. Regis Paper Co.Second Circuit· 1916-07-01· cited 18×
- Moline Plow Co. v. Omaha Iron Store Co.Eighth Circuit· 1916-07-24· cited 13×
- Utility Contractors Ass'n of New Jersey, Inc. v. ToopsThird Circuit· 1974-12-31· cited 13×
- United States Mitis Co. v. Detroit Steel & Spring Co.Sixth Circuit· 1903-05-19· cited 12×
- Searchlight Horn Co. v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.D. New Jersey· 1919-10-22· cited 12×
- Western Electric Co. v. Cinema Supplies, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1935-11-21· cited 8×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1974-12-31· cited 7×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court· 1888-03-19· cited 328×
- National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Eighth Circuit· 1901-02-28· cited 192×
- Furrer v. FerrisSupreme Court· 1892-05-02· cited 94×
- Warren v. BurtEighth Circuit· 1893-09-18· cited 51×
- Mann v. Keene Guaranty Sav. Bank of KeeneEighth Circuit· 1898-03-21· cited 22×
- Kinloch Tel. Co. v. Western Electric Co.Eighth Circuit· 1902-02-17· cited 21×
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. McClureEighth Circuit· 1897-01-25· cited 21×
- North American Exploration Co. v. AdamsEighth Circuit· 1900-10-15· cited 18×
- Moline Plow Co. of Kansas City v. CarsonEighth Circuit· 1895-12-30· cited 18×
- Hatch Storage Battery Co. v. Electric Storage Battery Co.First Circuit· 1900-03-16· cited 11×
- Allington & Curtis Manuf'g Co. v. BoothSecond Circuit· 1897-02-23· cited 10×
- Norton v. Agle Automatic Can Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California· 1893-08-16· cited 8×
- Sprague Electric Railway & Motor Co. v. Nassau Electric R. Co.Second Circuit· 1899-05-25· cited 8×
- American Bell Tel. Co. v. Southern Tel. Co.U.S. Circuit Court· 1888-04-21· cited 5×
- Green v. BarneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts· 1884-02-28· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.