Steamship Co. v. Tugman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that upon removal to federal court, the state court loses subject-matter jurisdiction and may proceed no further unless the case is remanded
• concluding “that further litigation of the action in state court is improper” after removal and until the case is remanded
• explaining that once a case is removed to federal court, “the jurisdiction of the State Court absolutely ceased ... [and][t]he duty of the State Court was to proceed no further in the cause”
• stating that, even if a party participates in state court proceedings without objecting to the state court’s lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because of a removal to federal court:and no remand, the party has not waived its complaint that the state court lacked jurisdiction
• “[A] corporation of a foreign state is, for purposes or jurisdiction in the courts of the United States, to be deemed, constructively, a citizen or subject of such state.”
• explain- ing that once a case is removed to federal court, \the jurisdiction of the State Court absolutely ceased . . . [and] [t]he duty of the State Court was to proceed no further in the cause\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).