· 11/12/1992
Danjaq, S.A. v. Pathe Communications Corporation Mgm-Pathe Communications Co. Tracinda Corporation Kirk Kerkorian Mgm/ua Communications Co.
Citations
- 979 F.2d 772
- 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9181
- 92 Daily Journal DAR 15253
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29710
- 1992 WL 324469
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the location of the \bulk\ of a corporation's activities was its principal place of business
- concluding that the location of the “bulk” of a corporation’s activities was its principal place of business
- holding that even a subsidiary’s activities should not be considered in determining a corporation’s principal place of business absent a showing that the subsidiary is merely an alter ego of its parent
- recognizing separate corporate identity of parent despite evidence that subsidiary \perform[ed] the lion's share\ of the film production for the parent
- noting that, when a subsidiary is the alter ego of a parent corporation, the subsidiary’s citizenship is presumed to match that of the parent corporation’s
- noting that, when a subsidiary is the alter ego of a parent corporation, the subsidiary’s citizenship is presumed to match that of the parent corporation’s
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feinberg, Goodwin, Schroeder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.