Skip to main content
· 11/12/1992

Danjaq, S.A. v. Pathe Communications Corporation Mgm-Pathe Communications Co. Tracinda Corporation Kirk Kerkorian Mgm/ua Communications Co.

Citations

  • 979 F.2d 772
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9181
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 15253
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29710
  • 1992 WL 324469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the location of the \bulk\ of a corporation's activities was its principal place of business
  • concluding that the location of the “bulk” of a corporation’s activities was its principal place of business
  • holding that even a subsidiary’s activities should not be considered in determining a corporation’s principal place of business absent a showing that the subsidiary is merely an alter ego of its parent
  • recognizing separate corporate identity of parent despite evidence that subsidiary \perform[ed] the lion's share\ of the film production for the parent
  • noting that, when a subsidiary is the alter ego of a parent corporation, the subsidiary’s citizenship is presumed to match that of the parent corporation’s
  • noting that, when a subsidiary is the alter ego of a parent corporation, the subsidiary’s citizenship is presumed to match that of the parent corporation’s

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Goodwin, Schroeder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.