State v. Zoppi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The State may encumber [the] privilege [to drive] with reasonable pre-conditions and may impose a continuing condition of non-abuse for the retention of the privilege.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hamm
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-08-06· cited 49×
• State v. Stern
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1984-11-19· cited 12×
• People v. Cruz
  Criminal Court of the City of New York· 1985-07-22· cited 4×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Berkemer v. McCarty
  Supreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
• Duncan v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 3,740×
• Baldwin v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 789×
• Muniz v. Hoffman
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 321×
• Kelly v. Gwinnell
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-06-27· cited 307×
• Frank v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1969-10-13· cited 306×
• Rodriguez v. ROSENBLATT
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1971-05-10· cited 143×
• State v. Dively
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-04-14· cited 111×
• State v. De Bonis
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1971-04-08· cited 82×
• In Re Yengo
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-08-04· cited 58×
• State v. Owens
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1969-06-04· cited 40×
• State v. Tenriero
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1981-12-16· cited 8×
• State v. Ferretti
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1983-04-29· cited 7×