Skip to main content

State v. Zimmerman

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 721

Syllabus

Where the evidence against the defendant was conflicting, and where jury foreperson admitted she viewed excluded prejudicial evidence and relayed what she saw to the other jurors at the outset of deliberations, and where officer witnesses offered hearsay testimony and improperly vouched for the credibility of the victim, defendant was deprived of a fair trial and the trial court abused its discretion when it denied defendant's motion for new trial.

Judges: Brunner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.