State v. Ziegler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in dicta, Court stated one may be guilty of armed robbery which involves grand larceny or petit larceny
• in dicta, Court stated one may be guilty of armed robbery which involves grand larceny or petit larceny
• in dicta, we stated one may be guilty of armed robbery which involves grand larceny or petit larceny
• in dicta, we stated one may be guilty of armed robbery which involves grand larceny or petit larceny

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Tucker
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-01-25· cited 45×
• State v. Bennett
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-12-01· cited 33×
• Hinton v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-01-12· cited 27×
• Joseph v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-10-14· cited 22×
• State v. Hall
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-12-21· cited 19×
• State v. Parker
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-10-14· cited 14×
• State v. Jefferies
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-04-22· cited 7×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-01-13
• State v. Russell Levon Johnson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-04-19

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• South Carolina Tax Commission v. Schafer Distributing Co.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1966-05-03· cited 3×