State v. Ziegler
Citations
- 2025 ND 78
Syllabus
A criminal judgment entered after a jury conviction of criminal mischief and stalking is affirmed. Without foundation testimony from the insurer, an insurer's letters regarding valuation of property constitute inadmissible hearsay if offered to prove value of the property at issue. Under the property owner rule, an owner may testify about the value of his property even if his opinion relies upon information from another. A district court's evidentiary error is harmless if improperly admitted evidence amounted to cumulative evidence.
Judges: Tufte, Jerod E.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pfliger v. Peavey Co.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-10-06· cited 20×
- Imus v. HuberNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1955-07-08· cited 16×
- Seckerson v. SinclairNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1913-02-10· cited 15×
- State v. VickermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-11-10· cited 10×
- Estate of FroemkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-08-17· cited 5×
- Boone v. MooreEighth Circuit· 1992-12-02· cited 4×
- State v. SanchezNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-05-30· cited 4×
- State v. GeigerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-11-24· cited 4×
- State v. HendersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-03-07· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.