State v. Sanchez
Citations
- 991 N.W.2d 71
- 2023 ND 106
Syllabus
The district court abuses its discretion when it allows testimony regarding statements made by a victim before the victim testifies and is subject to cross-examination regarding those statements. Allowing testimony regarding statements made by a victim before the victim testifies and is subject to cross-examination regarding those statements will be considered harmless if the testimony of the witnesses was merely cumulative to that of the victim. Substantial evidence existed to support the conviction and is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
Judges: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DopplerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-04-04· cited 31×
- United States v. Michael Lee BolickFourth Circuit· 1990-11-06· cited 23×
- State v. LeinenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-07-14· cited 19×
- State v. BurgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 16×
- State v. AzureNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-07-31· cited 12×
- State v. HelmNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-07-22· cited 8×
- City of Grafton v. WosickNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-05-14· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.