State v. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an offender must be found amenable for a SSOSA before he or she can be deemed eligible
• holding that an offender must be found amenable for a SSOSA before he or she can be deemed eligible
• ruling on expert services “shall not be overturned absent a clear showing of substantial prejudice.”
• “There is a presumption that the same words used twice in the act have the same meaning.”
• \The Legislature developed the special sentencing provision for first-time sex offenders in an attempt to prevent future crimes and protect society.\
• \The Legislature developed the special sentencing provision for first-time sex offenders in an attempt to prevent future crimes and protect society.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• State v. Thorne
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-08-08· cited 352×
• State v. Yates
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-09-27· cited 217×
• State v. Riles
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-06-04· cited 204×
• State v. Keller
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-03-22· cited 194×
• Carlton v. Black
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-12-09· cited 117×
• In Re Estate of Black
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-12-09· cited 114×
• In Re Lord
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-07-29· cited 112×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Lord
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-07-29· cited 112×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Skylstad
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-07-19· cited 76×
• State v. Rivas
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-06-01· cited 72×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-10-25· cited 72×
• State v. French
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-08-17· cited 62×
• In Re Detention of Ambers
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-05-31· cited 58×
• In re the Detention of Ambers
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-05-31· cited 57×
• Dailey v. North Coast Life Ins. Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-07-25· cited 56×
• State v. Lilyblad
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-02-07· cited 54×
• Dailey v. North Coast Life Insurance
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-07-25· cited 51×
• Certification from United States District Court for Western District of Washington In Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Asarco Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-04-10· cited 35×
• State v. Keller
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-12-13· cited 29×
• Allan v. University of Washington
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-04-20· cited 29×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and Paroles
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-12-31· cited 119×
• Alderwood Water District v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1963-06-13· cited 75×
• State v. Reding
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-09-10· cited 57×
• Anderson v. O'BRIEN
  Washington Supreme Court· 1974-07-11· cited 51×
• State v. Mines
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-10-24· cited 33×
• State v. Dickamore
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-03-15· cited 27×
• In Re Proceedings of King County Foreclosure of Liens
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 20×
• State v. Tuffree
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-07-05· cited 11×
• State v. Melos
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-01-21· cited 9×
• State v. Hermanson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-05-04· cited 8×
• Driscoll v. City of Bremerton
  Washington Supreme Court· 1955-12-15· cited 4×