Washington Supreme Court· 8/17/2006
State v. French
Citations
- 157 Wash. 2d 593
- 141 P.3d 54
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that double jeopardy and same criminal conduct 2 For the purposes of sentencing, “[t]wo crimes against a single victim constitute the ‘same criminal conduct’ if they (a) involve the same criminal intent; (b) were committed at the same time; and (c
- “A double jeopardy violation claim is distinct from a ‘same criminal conduct’ claim and requires a separate analysis.”
- “A double jeopardy violation claim is distinct from a ‘same criminal conduct’ claim and requires a separate analysis.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GracianoWashington Supreme Court· 2013-01-31· cited 185×
- State v. MutchWashington Supreme Court· 2011-06-09· cited 167×
- State v. LandCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-01-07· cited 76×
- State v. Peña FuentesWashington Supreme Court· 2014-02-06· cited 73×
- State v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court· 2006-08-17· cited 58×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-04-30· cited 58×
- Saldivar v. MomahCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-06-24· cited 54×
- State v. ChenowethWashington Supreme Court· 2016-03-17· cited 52×
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-07-17· cited 45×
- State Of Washington, Res/cross-app. v. George Donald Hatt, Jr., App/cross-res.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2019-11-18· cited 31×
- State v. BobenhouseCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-02-21· cited 27×
- State v. TorngrenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-11-25· cited 20×
- City of Seattle v. KleinWashington Supreme Court· 2007-09-13· cited 20×
- State of Washington v. Benjamin OrozcoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-10-07· cited 16×
- State Of Washington, V. Robert M. Fleeks, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2023-01-23· cited 12×
- State v. CuthbertCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-02-02· cited 10×
- State Of Washington, V. Stephen Wayne CanterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-06-01· cited 8×
- State v. StrattonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-07-03· cited 6×
- State of Washington v. Dahndre Kavaugn WestwoodCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-12-16· cited 2×
- State v. WestwoodWashington Supreme Court· 2023-09-07· cited 2×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1985-02-26· cited 3,332×
- State v. FreemanWashington Supreme Court· 2005-03-17· cited 261×
- State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court· 1999-10-07· cited 252×
- State v. LuveneWashington Supreme Court· 1995-10-12· cited 190×
- Asakura v. City of SeattleSupreme Court· 1924-05-26· cited 145×
- State v. LorenzWashington Supreme Court· 2004-07-01· cited 137×
- Johnson v. BrowneSupreme Court· 1907-04-08· cited 93×
- State v. SweetWashington Supreme Court· 1978-07-13· cited 74×
- State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court· 1995-01-19· cited 72×
- United States v. George Campbell, Also Known as Ramadan, Also Known as Roland CampbellSecond Circuit· 2002-08-07· cited 66×
- State v. GranthamCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-01-31· cited 61×
- United States v. Alphonse PersicoSecond Circuit· 1988-08-04· cited 58×
- State v. HandyWashington Supreme Court· 1902-03-01· cited 25×
- State v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-04-19· cited 15×
- Bozilov v. SeifertNinth Circuit· 1992-06-26· cited 13×
- State v. PangWashington Supreme Court· 1997-07-31· cited 9×
- State v. EstradaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-06-29· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.