Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/29/1982
State v. Wyman
Citations
- 651 P.2d 195
- 59 Or. App. 542
- 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3365
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where defendant raised issue after filing motion to suppress that was not resolved by the trial court, the issue remained for resolution on remand
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gillette, Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BridewellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-09-09· cited 13×
- State v. HerbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-08-21· cited 10×
- State v. RohrbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-10-26· cited 7×
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-29· cited 7×
- State v. BlasingameCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-04-20· cited 2×
- State v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-04-28· cited 2×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court· 1921-06-01· cited 1,253×
- State v. KellerOregon Supreme Court· 1973-06-01· cited 108×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-03-11· cited 76×
- State v. RagsdaleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-05-30· cited 14×
- State v. FrinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-09-17· cited 13×
- State v. WaterburyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-01-19· cited 9×
- State v. ChipleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-06-06· cited 8×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-03-16· cited 5×
- State v. RadfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-08-29· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.