Skip to main content
· 3/6/2001

State v. Wurtzberger

Citations

  • 40 S.W.3d 893
  • 2001 Mo. LEXIS 16
  • 2001 WL 220193

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that neither failure to object to an instruction, nor an express statement of “no objection” to an instruction, waive plain error review pursuant to Rule 30.20
  • holding a defendant “waived appellate review” when the defendant both failed to object to a proposed instruction and “told the. court expressly that he had no objection to the instruction”
  • counsel’s affirmative statement that he had no objection to the instruction and his failure to submit an alternative instruction did not waive plain error review
  • “Missouri has eliminated the distinction between principals and accessories, and now, all persons who act in concert to commit a crime are equally guilty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Limbaugh, Price, White, Holstein, Wolff, Benton, Stith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.