Skip to main content

State v. Wright

Citations

  • 243 N.E.3d 782
  • 2024 Ohio 1763

Syllabus

FOURTH AMENDMENT — SEARCH AND SEIZURE — AUTOMOBILE EXCEPTION — DRUG DOG — PROBABLE CAUSE — MOTION TO SUPPRESS — WAIVER: Defendant's argument that a drug-detection dog's sniff constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment because the dog could not differentiate between legal and illegal forms of marijuana was waived where defendant did not make this argument before the trial court. The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence found during a search of defendant's vehicle where officers had probable cause to believe the vehicle contained contraband based on multiple factors, including a drug-detection dog's alert.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a dog sniff can contribute to probable cause even though Ohio legalized forms of marijuana

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.