Supreme Court of Connecticut· 4/19/2005
State v. Wright
Citations
- 273 Conn. 418
- 870 A.2d 1039
- 2005 Conn. LEXIS 126
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[t]he sixth amendment to the United States constitution require[s] that criminal defendants be afforded a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
- “[t]he sixth amendment to the United States constitution require [s] that criminal defendants be afforded a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense” [internal quotation marks omitted]
- ‘‘[T]he defendant had no privilege to violate that order. If the defendant believed that the order did not comport with the statutory requirements of § 46b- 38c (e), he had two lawful remedies available to him. He could have (1
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zarella
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-09-26· cited 122×
- State v. Chasity WestSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-07-26· cited 64×
- State v. SingletonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-28· cited 45×
- Harris v. Bradley Memorial Hospital & Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-05-18· cited 41×
- City of Seattle v. MayWashington Supreme Court· 2011-10-21· cited 35×
- State v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-05-16· cited 23×
- State v. MARCELINO S.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-12-29· cited 17×
- Zoll v. ZollConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-01-27· cited 9×
- State v. SaucierConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-07-12· cited 9×
- State v. Na'im B.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-04-21· cited 3×
- State v. WarnerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2016-05-03· cited 3×
- State v. MannsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-10-11· cited 3×
- State v. HamiltonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-11-29· cited 3×
- State v. Cheryl J.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2021-04-13· cited 1×
- State v. Enrrique H.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-12-30· cited 1×
- State v. NARAINConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-02-21
- State v. NowackiConnecticut Appellate Court· 2015-03-10
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court· 1947-03-06· cited 2,872×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-06-09· cited 2,651×
- Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 621×
- United States v. Richard HicksFifth Circuit· 2004-12-07· cited 197×
- United States v. Providence Journal Co.Supreme Court· 1988-05-02· cited 142×
- Cologne v. Westfarms AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-08-06· cited 117×
- State v. CerretaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-05-21· cited 67×
- United States v. Bruce CutlerSecond Circuit· 1995-06-19· cited 66×
- In Re Roger NovakEleventh Circuit· 1991-06-07· cited 63×
- State v. ValentineSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-04-15· cited 63×
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 1986-12-31· cited 48×
- In Re Establishment Inspection of Hern Iron Works, Inc. Department of Labor Osha v. Hern Iron Works, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1989-08-03· cited 42×
- State v. SnappCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-01-06· cited 34×
- In Re Special ProceedingsFirst Circuit· 2004-06-21· cited 31×
- State v. MarkingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-04-21· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.