State v. Wright

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 5201

Syllabus

Because the circumstantial evidence presented by the state had the same probative value as direct evidence, appellant's convictions of improperly discharging a firearm at or into a habitation, discharging a firearm on or near a prohibited premises, and tampering with evidence, were supported by sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Because the trial court had merged count six with count four and the state elected to sentence on count four, appellant's assignment of error alleging that count six should have been merged with count five is moot. Judgment affirmed.