State v. Mitchell
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2772
Syllabus
Right to confrontation; joinder; allied offenses of similar import; weight and sufficiency of the evidence; admissibility of medical records; R.C. 2317.422; Evid.R. 803(6); Evid.R. 902(10). Trial court did not err when it admitted medical records that complied with R.C. 2317.422, Evid.R. 803(6), and Evid.R. 902(10) without the testimony of patient. The records were kept in the ordinary course of business and self-authenticating and did not require extrinsic testimony for admissibility. Further, the admission of the records did not violate the appellant's right to confrontation under the U.S. and Ohio Constitutions where there was no allegation that the records contained hearsay statements from the patient that were inadmissible without her testimony on the witness stand. The trial court did not err when it granted the State's motion to join the indictments of the two cases. Appellant failed to preserve the issue when he failed to object to the alleged prejudicial joinder at the close of testimony and he failed to establish that he was prejudiced by the joinder when the evidence was simple and direct and unlikely to cause the jury to consider propensity evidence. Appellant's conviction for vandalism was not supported by sufficient evidence where the State was required to establish knowing conduct and appellant's conduct was merely reckless. Appellant's other sufficiency arguments lacked merit since there was sufficient evidence to support his convictions for failure to comply, trafficking, and receiving stolen property. The appellate court declined to address the sufficiency of the criminal tools conviction due to appellant's failure to comply with appellate rules. Appellant's convictions were supported by the greater weight of the evidence. The State introduced direct and circumstantial evidence that identified the appellant as the perpetrator. Additionally, the State introduced evidence that established appellant acted knowingly when committing the crime of felonio
Judges: Groves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 2,913×
- United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court· 2004-06-14· cited 2,402×
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-09· cited 2,256×
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court· 1990-06-06· cited 1,930×
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- State v. FranklinOhio Supreme Court· 1991-11-20· cited 798×
- State v. SchaimOhio Supreme Court· 1992-10-28· cited 617×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2012-12-06· cited 491×
- State v. TorresOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-10· cited 471×
- State v. Dean (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-10-27· cited 243×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-17· cited 175×
- State v. BaileyOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-14· cited 155×
- State v. SelfOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-12· cited 148×
- State v. Spaulding (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-15· cited 143×
- State v. CassanoOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-09-06· cited 129×
- Strauss v. StraussOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-04· cited 65×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.