Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/17/1997

State v. Wrenn

Citations

945 P.2d 608
150 Or. App. 96

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that actual authority to consent to search of living room did not necessarily extend to the search of the kitchen
where state did not produce evidence to show that house guest’s actual authority to consent to search of living room also included kitchen, consent was invalid
where state did not produce evidence to show that house guest's actual authority to consent to search of living room also included kitchen, consent was invalid
state has burden of proving that the person who consented to search had actual authority to consent
homeless person permissively sleeping on couch for a few days lacked sufficient relationship to premises to have common authority to consent to search of kitchen area
where the state did not make an argument to the trial court, the defendant did not have an opportunity to respond to that argument, and the state did not raise that argument in its brief to this court, the court would not consider the argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deits, De Muniz Haselton, De Muniz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.