State v. RIVERA-NEGRETE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We will not entertain a new argument asserted for the first time during oral argument before this court.”
• “We will not entertain a new argument asserted for the first time during oral argument before this court.”
• con- cluding that “[w]e need not reach the state’s argument that * * * the officer had objectively reasonable concerns for his safety, because the state has not challenged the trial court’s conclusion that defendant was stopped, without reasonable suspicion”
• con- cluding that “[w]e need not reach the state’s argument that * * * the officer had objectively reasonable concerns for his safety, because the state has not challenged the trial court’s conclusion that defendant was stopped, without reasonable suspicion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).