State v. Worthy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring a showing of clear and convincing evidence as a precondition to admission of evidence under the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule
• acknowledging it is well-established that telephone conversations are wire communications

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lopez
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1995-05-16· cited 110×
• State v. Worthy
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-07-27· cited 28×
• D'Onofrio v. D'Onofrio
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-10-02· cited 6×
• State v. Lee
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-12-02· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1964-04-20· cited 1,662×
• State v. Sugar
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1985-07-24· cited 143×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-05-21· cited 65×
• State v. Minter
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-08-04· cited 43×
• State v. Casimono
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1992-01-24· cited 40×
• State v. Casimono
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-07-25· cited 35×
• State v. Sullivan
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-11-20· cited 2×