State v. Worthen
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2293
Syllabus
Obstructing Official Business; R.C. 2921.31(A); No-Contest Plea; Explanation of the Circumstances; Crim.R. 11(E). Defendant-appellant's conviction for obstructing official business, following his no-contest plea, was supported by sufficient evidence. The trial court did not fail to comply with the relevant provision of Crim.R. 11 in accepting defendant-appellant's no-contest plea. The trial court did not err by imposing both jail time and a fine for a misdemeanor.
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- City of Cuyahoga Falls v. BowersOhio Supreme Court· 1984-02-15· cited 155×
- Girard v. Giordano (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-12-18· cited 47×
- State v. WileyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-31· cited 4×
- State v. McBrideOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-17· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.