Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 4/1/1986
State v. Wortham
Citations
- 341 S.E.2d 76
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[e]vidence may be admitted even though remote in time, if its ‘signature’ value is high”
- decision to admit evidence rests in discretion of trial court
- discussing assault on a female and attempted rape
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eagles
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Glennon E. Engleman, United States of America v. Robert Handy, United States of America v. Glennon E. EnglemanEighth Circuit· 1981-06-03· cited 96×
- United States v. Robert Jackson, William Scott and Martin AllenSecond Circuit· 1977-11-07· cited 93×
- United States v. Charles Frederick Woods, and United States of America v. Gerald Keith UnderwoodSixth Circuit· 1980-01-03· cited 56×
- Proctor v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-11-07· cited 49×
- State v. . McBrydeSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1887-02-05· cited 44×
- State v. . BoonSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1852-06-05· cited 16×
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-01-09· cited 4×
- Jackson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-11-07· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.