United States v. Glennon E. Engleman, United States of America v. Robert Handy, United States of America v. Glennon E. Engleman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a thirteen-year-old offense was not too remote in time
• holding thirteen-year-old offense not too remote in time
• applying informant exception where wife consented to recording of spousal communications
• no abuse of discretion when district court admitted evidence of crime that defendant committed thirteen years before charged offense
• no abuse of discretion when district court admitted evidence of crime that defendant committed thirteen years before charged offense
• district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that thirteen years was not an unreasonable time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).